Uncategorized
“Voices” Acts 9:36-43 and John 10:22-30
An explanation:
The Hebrew word for widow
connotes one who is silent, one unable to speak. In a society in
which males played the public role and in which women did not speak
on their own behalf, the position of widow, particularly if an eldest
son was not yet married, was one of extreme vulnerability. If there
were no sons, a widow might return to her paternal family if that
recourse were available. Younger widows were often considered a
potential danger to the community and urged to remarry.
Left out of the prospect of
inheritance by Hebrew law, widows became the stereotypical symbol of
the exploited and oppressed. Old Testament criticism of the harsh
treatment of these women is prevalent. So are the texts in which
they are under the special protection of God.1
In our reading from Acts this
week, we hear “All the townswomen who had been widowed stood beside
[Peter] weeping, and showed him the various garments Dorcas had made
when she was still with them.” (Acts 9:39b, Inclusive Bible)
I have to admit something. I’ve
read this passage many times, and every time I saw the widows as
showing off Tabitha/Doras’s impressive needlework, and thought it was
sort of a strange details, but otherwise ignored it.
Maybe my heart is in a different
place this week, because when I read it THIS week I thought, “Oh.
My. Gosh. She literally clothed the widows.” The women were
showing Peter her GOOD WORKS that had blessed their lives as proof to
him that she was worthy of his healing.
(Which, of course, makes far
more sense and most of you probably noticed ages ago, but I’m slow
and I try to admit it because the Bible is dense and none of us can
make sense of it all at once.)
There is another detail to know
about this story, an important one. Not only is Tabitha named in
this story, which is pretty unusual for Biblical women, and named
TWICE which is even less usual. She is called a disciple. Now, if
you were wondering if that was unusual, let me answer with a
scholarly quote, “Luke uses the feminine form for ‘disciple’ –
the only time it is used in the NT.”2
This is the ONLY woman in the
Bible called a disciple of Jesus, who is described as someone who
“never tired of doing kind things or giving to charity,” at whose
death the people who are most exploited and oppressed gather,
grieving, and trying to prove her worth by showing the gifts she had
made them.
I am incredibly moved by the
example of this first woman disciple.
Because, here is the thing about
Tabitha. Her story suggests that as a follower of Jesus, she spent
her life making things easier for the most vulnerable people around
her, but not just by giving them things, but also by loving them.
I don’t think the level of grief we hear from the women who’d been
widowed in this story reflects a fear that new clothes are going to
be harder to come by. I think their FRIEND, who saw them, and eased
their burdens, had died.
Tabitha heard their voices, and
used her life to respond to their needs. Where the Bible talks about
God’s special protection for the widows, it seems that Tabitha was
part of God’s work.
A disciple of Jesus, a little
Christ, indeed. In John, the voice of Jesus says, “My sheep hear
my voice. I know them, and they follow me.” It is clear in this
story in Acts that Tabitha knew the voice of Jesus, and followed.
And set an example for those of us who come after her.

Now, widowhood is not today what
it was then. Today’s widows may well be struggling with economic
hardship, but the first connotation of widow is “someone who has
lost her love” instead of “someone who has lost her livelihood
and protection.”
Which means that when we are
trying to consider who the “stereotypical symbol of the exploited
and oppressed” is in our society, I don’t think it defaults to
widows anymore. Nor do I think there is one simple answer. I fear
that who is seen as the “stereotypical symbol of the exploited and
oppressed” is as impacted by context, perception, and political
party as all of our other opinions. Meaning, I’d likely start the
list with trans women of color (#mostlikelytobemurdered) and could
continue on from there to an expansive list.
After this week I am concerned
that an addition to the highest levels of the list of “stereotypical
symbol of the exploited and oppressed” is going to need to be
“anyone capable of becoming pregnant who doesn’t want to be
pregnant.” Because, it seems, our society is about to declare that
people who become pregnant stop having authority over their own
bodies. (Happy Mothers’ Day.)
You want to know what else is
really interesting about Tabitha? We get two names for her, she is
called a disciple, she is known for her good works. And, in addition
to all that, neither her marital nor social status is mentioned.
She’s known for HER works, and they eclipse the question of who she
belongs to. Which, to be fair was the sort of kindom building equity
the early church was going for, but it is still pretty notable when
it happens! It also seems notable that those widows were named as
believers. They weren’t just recipients of charity, nor even simply
friends of a disciple. They too were the church. The church was of
everyone, even those whose NAME implied “the silenced.” It seems
like Tabitha’s church had stayed very close to the roots of Jesus’s
movement.
The question of who is
particularly vulnerable, exploited, oppressed is really a question of
who Jesus would be hanging out with. To his credit, Jesus took a
really expansive view of that as well, including fishermen and tax
collectors, widows and single women, children and senators,
adulterers and the mentally ill, hemorrhaging women and those with
physical disabilities.
Several years ago, when I was
nearing time to go to camp, I had to let someone know I wouldn’t be
available for some meeting during camp. (This was not a person in
this church or community.) The person responded, “Oh, that’s
right, you go to camp and work with people with special needs.
That’s so good of you!”
I. Am. Still. Mad.
Furious.
Because, going to camp is the
most selfish thing I do all year. I got camp because I love the
campers. I go to camp because I love camp. I go to camp because my
humanity and faith are restored by camp and by the campers.
I’m not a GOOD person for that,
and to imply that I am implies that there is something wrong with the
campers and THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE CAMPERS. Everything is
right with the campers.
Which makes me wonder a bit. I
think likely Tabitha and the widows of her community were friends,
real friends, people who loved each other and mutually gained from
their connections. I wonder if a question we should be asking in
response to Tabitha’s story is, “who do I find it easy to love and
grow with, and how can I let that love expand my heart to let even
more people in?”
I worry that this question COULD
keep us too closed off, too limited to those we already know, too
small. But then I remember what LOVE is like, and how everyone has
stories that matter, and everyone has experiences of oppression, and
how LOVE likes to expand itself all over the place. And I find I’m
ready to trust love to be our guide.
I believe our faith calls us to
see the humanity in ALL people, including those who are oppressed,
and to share our love and our lives with mutuality and respect. And,
to be open to letting that love expand to those we don’t yet know who
have struggles we don’t yet understand. Let love be our guide, and
let it expand in us. I believe that’s what it means to follow Jesus’
voice, and Tabitha’s example. May God help us do it! Amen
1Bruce
J. Malina and Richard L. Rohrbaugh Social-Science Commentary on the
Synoptic Gospels (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003) “Widow,”
423.
2Robert
Wall, “Book of Acts” in New Interpreter’s Bible Vol 10I ed.
Leander E. Keck et al
(Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2002) footnote p. 161.
Rev. Sara E. Baron
First United Methodist Church of Schenectady
603 State St. Schenectady, NY 12305
Pronouns: she/her/hers
http://fumcschenectady.org/
https://www.facebook.com/FUMCSchenectady
May 8, 2022